<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Naval Intelligence &#124; Naval News &#124; Naval Education &#124; War Studies &#124; NOSI - Naval Open Source Intelligence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nosi.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nosi.org</link>
	<description>is a digital library of operational naval news, curated from open source intelligence, and intended to serve as a source of continuing naval education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:01:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>US Navy &#8211; Defense leaders push US to sign sea treaty</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/17/us-navy-defense-leaders-push-us-to-sign-sea-treaty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/17/us-navy-defense-leaders-push-us-to-sign-sea-treaty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USNavy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=12033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Associated Press &#8211; Top defense leaders argued Wednesday for the U.S. to ratify a long-debated treaty governing ocean rights in order to bolster the nation&#8217;s national security interests in the Asia-Pacific region and other key global waters.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_SEA_TREATY?SITE=NMSAN">Associated Press</a> &#8211; Top defense leaders argued Wednesday for the U.S. to ratify a long-debated treaty governing ocean rights in order to bolster the nation&#8217;s national security interests in the Asia-Pacific region and other key global waters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/17/us-navy-defense-leaders-push-us-to-sign-sea-treaty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Piracy &#8211; Somali piracy: EU forces in first mainland raid</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/16/piracy-somali-piracy-eu-forces-in-first-mainland-raid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/16/piracy-somali-piracy-eu-forces-in-first-mainland-raid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=12049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- BBC &#8211; EU naval forces have conducted their first raid on pirate bases on the Somali mainland, saying they have destroyed several boats.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-18069685">BBC</a> &#8211; EU naval forces have conducted their first raid on pirate bases on the Somali mainland, saying they have destroyed several boats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/16/piracy-somali-piracy-eu-forces-in-first-mainland-raid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Navy &#8211; U.S. plans 10-month warship deployment to Singapore</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/16/us-navy-u-s-plans-10-month-warship-deployment-to-singapore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/16/us-navy-u-s-plans-10-month-warship-deployment-to-singapore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USNavy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=12031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Reuters &#8211; The first of a new class of U.S. coastal warships will be sent to Singapore next spring for a roughly 10-month deployment, spotlighting a move that may stir China&#8217;s fears of U.S. involvement in South China Sea disputes.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCABRE8481IE20120510?sp=true">Reuters</a> &#8211; The first of a new class of U.S. coastal warships will be sent to Singapore next spring for a roughly 10-month deployment, spotlighting a move that may stir China&#8217;s fears of U.S. involvement in South China Sea disputes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/16/us-navy-u-s-plans-10-month-warship-deployment-to-singapore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Royal Navy &#8211; Critics attack Government U-turn on fighter jets</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/15/royal-navy-critics-attack-government-u-turn-on-fighter-jets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/15/royal-navy-critics-attack-government-u-turn-on-fighter-jets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 00:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RoyalNavy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=12029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Daily Telegraph &#8211; A major retreat over aircraft for the Royal Navy’s new carriers will be announced today, abandoning plans to buy the conventional take-off version of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. Philip Hammond, the Defence Secretary, will tell MPs that the Government will now purchase the jump-jet model of the plane instead.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/9256581/Critics-attack-Government-U-turn-on-fighter-jets.html">Daily Telegraph</a> &#8211; A major retreat over aircraft for the Royal Navy’s new carriers will be announced today, abandoning plans to buy the conventional take-off version of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. Philip Hammond, the Defence Secretary, will tell MPs that the Government will now purchase the jump-jet model of the plane instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/15/royal-navy-critics-attack-government-u-turn-on-fighter-jets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Navy &#8211; What Price Freedom?: LCS-1 Leaves Dry Dock Amid Questions About Worthiness</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/14/us-navy-what-price-freedom-lcs-1-leaves-dry-dock-amid-questions-about-worthiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/14/us-navy-what-price-freedom-lcs-1-leaves-dry-dock-amid-questions-about-worthiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 00:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USNavy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=12027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Aviation Week &#8211; The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS-1) USS Freedom is plagued by extensive corrosion and manufacturing issues more recent and serious than anything the Pentagon or prime contractor Lockheed Martin has publicly acknowledged thus far. This is based on a guided tour of the ship in dry dock, as well as sources intimately [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/Article/PrintArticle.aspx?id=/article-xml/awx_05_09_2012_p0-456228.xml&#038;p=1&#038;printView=true">Aviation Week</a> &#8211; The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS-1) USS Freedom is plagued by extensive corrosion and manufacturing issues more recent and serious than anything the Pentagon or prime contractor Lockheed Martin has publicly acknowledged thus far. This is based on a guided tour of the ship in dry dock, as well as sources intimately familiar with Freedom’s design, repairs and operations, U.S. Navy documents and defense analysts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/14/us-navy-what-price-freedom-lcs-1-leaves-dry-dock-amid-questions-about-worthiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Navy &#8211; The Navy&#8217;s Pacific Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/13/us-navy-the-navys-pacific-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/13/us-navy-the-navys-pacific-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 00:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USNavy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=12025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Foreign Policy &#8211; Does the U.S. military have the resources for an Asian century?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/03/30/this_week_at_war_the_navys_pacific_problem?print=yes&#038;hidecomments=yes&#038;page=full">Foreign Policy</a> &#8211; Does the U.S. military have the resources for an Asian century?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/13/us-navy-the-navys-pacific-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Coast Guard &#8211; New Coast Guard ship has rust, holes in hull</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/12/us-coast-guard-new-coast-guard-ship-has-rust-holes-in-hull/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/12/us-coast-guard-new-coast-guard-ship-has-rust-holes-in-hull/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 00:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USCoastGuard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=12023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Associated Press &#8211; When a boat springs a leak, it&#8217;s often the Coast Guard to the rescue. But who rescues the Coast Guard when one its new ships does the same thing?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_LEAKY_SHIP?SITE=NMSAN">Associated Press</a> &#8211; When a boat springs a leak, it&#8217;s often the Coast Guard to the rescue. But who rescues the Coast Guard when one its new ships does the same thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/12/us-coast-guard-new-coast-guard-ship-has-rust-holes-in-hull/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Royal Navy &#8211; Navy &#8216;forced to drop year-round Somalia piracy patrols&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/11/royal-navy-navy-forced-to-drop-year-round-somalia-piracy-patrols/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/11/royal-navy-navy-forced-to-drop-year-round-somalia-piracy-patrols/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RoyalNavy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=12021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Daily Telegraph &#8211; The Royal Navy no longer has enough warships to dedicate one to fighting piracy off the coast of Somalia all year round, it was reported.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/9253764/Navy-forced-to-drop-year-round-Somalia-piracy-patrols.html">Daily Telegraph</a> &#8211; The Royal Navy no longer has enough warships to dedicate one to fighting piracy off the coast of Somalia all year round, it was reported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/11/royal-navy-navy-forced-to-drop-year-round-somalia-piracy-patrols/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligence &#8211; China’s Accidental Spies</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/10/intelligence-china%e2%80%99s-accidental-spies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/10/intelligence-china%e2%80%99s-accidental-spies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=12017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Pacific Standard &#8211; Is an unassuming group of Chinese bloggers who are obsessed with military hardware doing the Pentagon’s work? Or Beijing’s?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.psmag.com/politics/chinas-accidental-spies-40541/">Pacific Standard</a> &#8211; Is an unassuming group of Chinese bloggers who are obsessed with military hardware doing the Pentagon’s work? Or Beijing’s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/10/intelligence-china%e2%80%99s-accidental-spies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Navy &#8211; Electronic Blast Slated for Unmanned Attack Aircraft</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/09/us-navy-electronic-blast-slated-for-unmanned-attack-aircraft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/09/us-navy-electronic-blast-slated-for-unmanned-attack-aircraft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 00:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USNavy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=12015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Defense Technology International &#8211; Most aircraft slated to go onto aircraft carries have to go through an electronic magnetic interference test that bathes the design in about 200 volts per meter. But the test platform for the Navy’s unmanned carrier-launched airborne surveillance and strike (Uclass) aircraft program, will have to endure 10 times the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/Blogs.aspx?plckController=Blog&#038;plckScript=blogScript&#038;plckElementId=blogDest&#038;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&#038;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a6f9b3752-2f93-4ba5-9e89-de12fae81857">Defense Technology International</a> &#8211; Most aircraft slated to go onto aircraft carries have to go through an electronic magnetic interference test that bathes the design in about 200 volts per meter. But the test platform for the Navy’s unmanned carrier-launched airborne surveillance and strike (Uclass) aircraft program, will have to endure 10 times the electronic stress. Undoubtedly that means the Navy wants a design for its unmanned carrier-launched airborne surveillance and strike (UCLASS) aircraft program that would be able to fire a permanently installed, rechargeable, anti-electronics weapon. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/09/us-navy-electronic-blast-slated-for-unmanned-attack-aircraft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Navy &#8211; Platforms and Upgrades Will Change Electronic Warfare</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/08/us-navy-platforms-and-upgrades-will-change-electronic-warfare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/08/us-navy-platforms-and-upgrades-will-change-electronic-warfare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USNavy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=12013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Defense Technology International &#8211; The U.S. Navy&#8217;s F/A-XX strike fighter, the EA-18G Growler, an unmanned combat aircraft (currently exemplified by two X-47B test platforms) and a nascent arsenal of specialized air-launched standoff weapons are all part of a new emphasis on exploiting the electro-magnetic spectrum.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/Blogs.aspx?plckController=Blog&#038;plckScript=blogScript&#038;plckElementId=blogDest&#038;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&#038;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3ab8a8dcd0-c9cd-45bd-9de7-580e9982db33">Defense Technology International</a> &#8211; The U.S. Navy&#8217;s F/A-XX strike fighter, the EA-18G Growler, an unmanned combat aircraft (currently exemplified by two X-47B test platforms) and a nascent arsenal of specialized air-launched standoff weapons are all part of a new emphasis on exploiting the electro-magnetic spectrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/08/us-navy-platforms-and-upgrades-will-change-electronic-warfare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miscellaneous &#8211; The Desert One Debacle</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/07/miscellaneous-the-desert-one-debacle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/07/miscellaneous-the-desert-one-debacle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=12011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- The Atlantic &#8211; Mark Bowden writes that in April 1980, President Jimmy Carter sent the Army’s Delta Force to bring back fifty-three American citizens held hostage in Iran. Everything went wrong. The fireball in the Iranian desert took the Carter presidency with it. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/print/2006/05/the-desert-one-debacle/4803/">The Atlantic</a> &#8211; Mark Bowden writes that in April 1980, President Jimmy Carter sent the Army’s Delta Force to bring back fifty-three American citizens held hostage in Iran. Everything went wrong. The fireball in the Iranian desert took the Carter presidency with it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/07/miscellaneous-the-desert-one-debacle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Royal Navy &#8211; Nowhere To Run</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/06/royal-navy-nowhere-to-run/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/06/royal-navy-nowhere-to-run/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 00:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RoyalNavy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=12009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Defense Technology International &#8211; Bill Sweetman describes how if Scotland becomes independent, there may be no place to base the UK&#8217;s ballistic missile submarine force.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/DT_04_01_2012_p04-440383.xml">Defense Technology International</a> &#8211; Bill Sweetman describes how if Scotland becomes independent, there may be no place to base the UK&#8217;s ballistic missile submarine force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/06/royal-navy-nowhere-to-run/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Information Warfare &#8211; People Power 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/05/information-warfare-people-power-2-0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/05/information-warfare-people-power-2-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 00:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[InformationWarfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=12001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Technology Review &#8211; How civilians helped win the Libyan information war.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/web/40214/">Technology Review</a> &#8211; How civilians helped win the Libyan information war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/05/information-warfare-people-power-2-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Marines &#8211; Marines prepare to open combat jobs to women</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/04/us-marines-marines-prepare-to-open-combat-jobs-to-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/04/us-marines-marines-prepare-to-open-combat-jobs-to-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USMarines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=11999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- San Diego Union Tribune &#8211; The Marine Corps will begin assigning women to newly opened combat jobs this year, conduct research on their physical capabilities, and in the most striking move, open the infantry officer training course to them, the commandant said in a message to all Marines Monday.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/apr/24/marines-prepare-open-infantry-officer-course-women/">San Diego Union Tribune</a> &#8211; The Marine Corps will begin assigning women to newly opened combat jobs this year, conduct research on their physical capabilities, and in the most striking move, open the infantry officer training course to them, the commandant said in a message to all Marines Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/04/us-marines-marines-prepare-to-open-combat-jobs-to-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Marines &#8211; U.S. comes to agreement with Japan to move 9,000 Marines off Okinawa</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/03/us-marines-u-s-comes-to-agreement-with-japan-to-move-9000-marines-off-okinawa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/03/us-marines-u-s-comes-to-agreement-with-japan-to-move-9000-marines-off-okinawa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USMarines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=11997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Washington Post &#8211; The U.S. and Japanese governments said Thursday that they will move about 9,000 Marines off Okinawa to other bases in the Western Pacific, in a bid to remove a persistent irritant in the relationship between the two allies.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/somnia/2012/04/26/gIQA1seKkT_story.html">Washington Post</a> &#8211; The U.S. and Japanese governments said Thursday that they will move about 9,000 Marines off Okinawa to other bases in the Western Pacific, in a bid to remove a persistent irritant in the relationship between the two allies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/03/us-marines-u-s-comes-to-agreement-with-japan-to-move-9000-marines-off-okinawa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Navy &#8211; Shoal mates</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/02/chinese-navy-shoal-mates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/02/chinese-navy-shoal-mates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 00:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ChineseNavy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=11995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- The Economist &#8211; America’s navy riles China in its backyard
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.economist.com/node/21553474">The Economist</a> &#8211; America’s navy riles China in its backyard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/02/chinese-navy-shoal-mates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Navy &#8211; How Effective Will China’s Carrier-Based Fighters Be?</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/01/chinese-navy-how-effective-will-china%e2%80%99s-carrier-based-fighters-be/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/01/chinese-navy-how-effective-will-china%e2%80%99s-carrier-based-fighters-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ChineseNavy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=11993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- DefenseTech &#8211; An exceprt from an analysis of what the J-15 will mean for China’s neighbors written last sumer by DefenseTech&#8217;s go to China guru Andrew Erickson.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://defensetech.org/2012/04/25/how-effective-will-chinas-carrier-based-fighters-be/">DefenseTech</a> &#8211; An exceprt from an analysis of what the J-15 will mean for China’s neighbors written last sumer by DefenseTech&#8217;s go to China guru Andrew Erickson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/05/01/chinese-navy-how-effective-will-china%e2%80%99s-carrier-based-fighters-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Navy &#8211; China’s Carrier Fighter Fleet</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/04/30/chinese-navy-china%e2%80%99s-carrier-fighter-fleet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/04/30/chinese-navy-china%e2%80%99s-carrier-fighter-fleet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ChineseNavy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=11991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- DefenseTech &#8211; Some photos of China’s entire carrier-based fighter fleet.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://defensetech.org/2012/04/24/chinas-carrier-fighter-fleet/">DefenseTech</a> &#8211; Some photos of China’s entire carrier-based fighter fleet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/04/30/chinese-navy-china%e2%80%99s-carrier-fighter-fleet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Royal Navy &#8211; HMS Astute submarine grounding was caused be navigation and planning errors</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/2012/04/29/royal-navy-hms-astute-submarine-grounding-was-caused-be-navigation-and-planning-errors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nosi.org/2012/04/29/royal-navy-hms-astute-submarine-grounding-was-caused-be-navigation-and-planning-errors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 00:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RoyalNavy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nosi.org/?p=11989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Daily Telegraph &#8211; A series of errors contributed to the grounding of a nuclear-powered submarine off the west coast of Scotland more than two years ago, a report has found.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/9221435/HMS-Astute-submarine-grounding-was-caused-be-navigation-and-planning-errors.html">Daily Telegraph</a> &#8211; A series of errors contributed to the grounding of a nuclear-powered submarine off the west coast of Scotland more than two years ago, a report has found.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nosi.org/2012/04/29/royal-navy-hms-astute-submarine-grounding-was-caused-be-navigation-and-planning-errors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.427 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-17 12:36:22 -->

