<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by UserLand Frontier v9.5 on Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:25:47 GMT -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>NOSI - Naval Open Source Intelligence: Disarmament</title>
		<link>http://www.nosi.org/newsItems/departments/disarmament</link>
		<description>- is a digital library of operational naval news, curated from open source intelligence, and intended to serve as a source of continuing naval education</description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2008 Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:25:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<generator>UserLand Frontier v9.5</generator>
		<managingEditor>thedalessandros@hotmail.com (Michael P. D'Alessandro, M.D.)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>thedalessandros@hotmail.com (Michael D'Alessandro)</webMaster>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<title>Disarmament - U.S. Policy on Small Arms and Light Weapons</title>
			<link>http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/Review/2006/winter/art5-w06.htm</link>
			<description>
&lt;b&gt;Naval War College Review&lt;/b&gt; - The United States has for over a decade pursued a cautious and incremental approach to limiting the proliferation of small arms and light weapons. It has led, supported, and devised valuable initiatives and procedures, but it has characteristically refused&#151;largely for reasons of domestic politics&#151;to participate in formal, legally binding international arrangements. This approach could harm both unstable regions and perceptions of American commitments among allies and partners.
</description>
			<guid>http://www.nosi.org/discuss/msgReader$2764</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:50:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<category>Disarmament</category>
			<dc:creator>Michael D'Alessandro</dc:creator>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Disarmament - If the Nuclear Taboo Gets Broken&#160;</title>
			<link>http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/Review/2005/spring/art3-sp05.htm</link>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Naval War College Review&lt;/b&gt; - Another use of nuclear weapons, for the first time since Nagasaki, is far  from inevitable, but giving advance thought to the ways it could happen  and to the policies that would be appropriate in response may be essential  to heading it off.
&lt;p&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://www.nosi.org/discuss/msgReader$2348</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2005 09:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<category>Disarmament</category>
			<dc:creator>Michael D'Alessandro</dc:creator>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Disarmament - The Wrong Deterrence</title>
			<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A30535-2004Sep17.html?</link>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Washington Post&lt;/b&gt; - Bruce Blair states the the threat of loose nuclear weapons is one of our own making...and that the current deterrent practices of the two nuclear superpowers are not only anachronistic, they are thwarting our ability to protect ourselves against the real threats.
&lt;p&gt;
He also relates how the US Navy's communication system with its Trident-class ballistic missile submarines was found to be vulnerable to terrorist hackers...</description>
			<guid>http://www.nosi.org/discuss/msgReader$1599</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:46:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<category>Disarmament</category>
			<dc:creator>Michael D'Alessandro</dc:creator>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Disarmament - The Death of Disarmament in Russia?</title>
			<link>http://carlisle-www.army.mil/usawc/Parameters/04summer/bernier.htm</link>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Parameters&lt;/b&gt; - Is the pace of Russian disarmament slowing down?</description>
			<guid>http://www.nosi.org/discuss/msgReader$1391</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2004 10:26:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<category>Disarmament</category>
			<dc:creator>Michael D'Alessandro</dc:creator>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
